Payment intent; the missing ingredient in risk management

Go to download page to register or log-in to access this paper in full »

Following on from the BBC’s Panorama programme ‘Can’t Pay, Won’t Pay’ – Fraudscreen warns that taking a ‘same difference’ approach to people who ‘can’t pay’ as to people who ‘won’t pay’ is costing companies, and our economy, millions.

Front cover of discussion paperThe paper comes at a time when the UK economy is widely reported to be in recession and many people are slipping into debt for the first time. James Middlehurst, the paper’s author and chief executive at Fraudscreen suggests that the ‘Can’t Pay’ vs. ‘Won’t Pay’ scenario, outlined by Paul Kenyon in the BBC Panorama documentary, albeit an over-simplification of the reality does at least recognise the two elements that make up risk of non-payment – ability and intent. A distinction missed by traditional credit scoring and an aspect that will become increasingly evident as the economy moves into recession.

Fraudscreen advises assessing risk by combining both ability and intent to pay at the same time. With this approach, Fraudscreen have identified four states of payment likelihood:

Middlehurst goes on to provide examples from various industries, where credit referencing alone could not have predicted non-payment and concludes by advising companies on three key strategic areas where predicting payment intent could improve performance, the report recommends:

Go to download »